In particular, the activity of producing the target language may, under certain circumstances, prompt l2 learners to recognize some of their linguistic problems and bring to their attention something they need to discover about their l2. Swain s comprehensible output researchbased pedagogical implications. Teaching classical languages spring 20 after krashen. Rather, the claim is that sometimes, under some conditions, output facilitates second language learning in ways that are different form, or enhance. The skillbuilding hypothesis maintains that we acquire language when we consciously learn rules of grammar and vocabulary, and we. Various taskbased exercises accompany these text collections. They underline the importance of negotiation for meaning and inputfeedbackmodified output in oral interaction. Other hypotheses which are useful in the context of clil include swain s output hypothesis 1985, which underlines the necessity for maximized opportunities for language practice and productionboth oral and written. Holly genova and mary amanda stewart my life, my stories. This is the original version of principles and practice, as published in 1982, with only minor. Swain 1985 proposed a hypothesis relating to the second language l2 learners production comparable. This study addresses one of the functions of output proposed by swain 1993, 1995, 1998. Mar 14, 2016 annotated bibliography entry for swains the output hypothesis posted on march 14, 2016 by espirido swain, m.
The crucial role of output has been laid out in the concept of pushed output or output hypothesis proposed in swain 1985 swain, 2000 swain, 2005, which claims that when pushed to. Outputoriented language learning with digital media. International journal of english language and literature. Acrobat pdf files of individual plants, with photos, drawings, and a brief discussion of preparations, uses, specific indications and any contraindications. First, she says output provides a hypothesistesting function. Merrill swains comprehensible output theory by chance york. The benefits of outputbased instruction observed in the study can be discussed with regards to swains output hypothesis.
Even when we do find supporting evidence, when the hypothesis makes the correct prediction, a critic can always say. Merrill swain is professor in the curriculum, teaching and learning department at the ontario institute for studies in education oise at the university of toronto. At the inception, i derived theoretical courage from swains com. The output hypothesis swain 1985 best writing service. Developed by merrill swain, the comprehensible output co hypothesis. If you remember, krashen had argued that comprehensible input alone is a sufficient condition for second language acquisition to occur, with. Swain also attributes an important role to collaborative dialogue, i. Oct 05, 2014 comprehensible output hypothesis output is closely related to the process of language production. To summarize, the four functions of output in sla based on swain s ideas are. In it, we can observe learners operating on linguistic data operations that move inward to become part of the participants own mental activity. University of groningen student interaction in the.
Based on krashens 1980 input hypothesis, swain s 1995 output hypothesis, and in response to brian tomlinsons 2014 call for principled evaluations of language materials, this study compared assignment sheets provided by esl instructors from ball states intensive english institute iei with assignment sheets provided by first year composition fyc instructors. Based on krashen s 1980 input hypothesis, swain s 1995 output hypothesis, and in response to brian tomlinson s 2014 call for principled evaluations of language materials, this study compared assignment sheets provided by esl instructors from ball state s intensive english institute iei with assignment sheets provided by first year composition fyc instructors. Swain s1985study,onethatinvolvedaresearchdesign with narration tasks based on the retelling of a film, was critical fo r the. Communication tasks have the following characteristics ellis, 1982. Business ukrainian online alla nedashkivska university of alberta abstract. Lectures in botanical materia medica some mp3 excerpts from the 4cdrom set. Contrary to the predictions of the involvement load hypothesis laufer and hulstijn, 2001, the results. Based on the results in the present study, we can conclude that this kind of formfocused task does promote noticing or some kind of form processing in the input. I will attach some articles which swain published plus one interesting article by another authors testing the output hypothesis. After over a decade of research into swain s 1985 comprehensible output co hypothesis, there is still a severe lack of data showing that learner output or output modifications have any. The input hypothesis is krashens attempt to explain how the learner acquires a second language how second language acquisition takes place. This section will then focus on input and output which are pointed out by swain 2000.
According to swain s 1985 output hypothesis, language output may trigger the learner to pay. It is gratifying to point out that many of the predictions made in this book were confirmed by subsequent research, for example, the superiority of comprehensibleinput. Fenners complete formulary and handbook 1888 unlike such official pharmaceutical texts as the u. Testing the noticing function of the output hypothesis. The contribution of outputoriented and inputoriented. Implication of output hypothesis on teaching college. This she termed the comprehensible output hypothesis for sla swain, 1985, p. Annotated bibliography entry for swains the output hypothesis. Swains output hypothesis 1985, 1998, output may in. This goal adheres to swain s output hypothesis 1995, which looks at output as having three functions. The output hypothesis states that it is the action of producing language, speaking and writing, which develops part of the process of second language learning how proficient learners become.
It therefore supports one of the claims of swain s 1995 output hypothesis. The effect of swains push out hypothesis on promoting jordanian. Krashens input hypothesis and swains output hypothesis. Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate. As it can be noticed, there is a need for implementing and improving the use of these two skills which are different from the input hypothesis and that could be grouped together. Theoretical, empirical and pedagogical considerations abstract.
The current version of output hypothesis swain, 1995, 1998, 2005 assumes four major roles for output in facilitating l2 development. Ctl merrill swain curriculum, teaching and learning at oise. Models of integrating content and language learning jiaying howard monterey institute of international studies. The output hypothesis stripped to its bare bones is that even without implicit or. Moreover, output errors produced by learners, whether written or spoken, give a clear image of how learners hypothesize. Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. The four strands victoria university of wellington. Swain s observational data of the french immersion program in canada allen, swain, harley. This means that the dialogue learners engage in takes on new significance. According to krashens input hypothesis, acquisition takes place when.
Chapter 7 the effect of interaction in acquiring the grammar. Output hypotheses the chief rivals of the comprehension hypothesis are two kinds of output plus feedback hypotheses. Since swain 1985 proposed the output hypothesis, she has explored more about this hypothesis and identified three roles of output in secondlanguage acquisition. Swain 14,15 also goes against krashens radical posi tion towards the role of input and argues in favor of the output hypothesis, later named as lingualization 16. Swain teaches graduate courses in second language education program at oiseut. Krashens monitor hypothesis to maintain accuracy, learners should be encouraged to activate their conscious learning to monitor. Revisiting input and output hypotheses in second language learning. First, she says output provides a hypothesis testing function. Studies about the function of output in language acquisition are mainly based on swain 1985 output hypothesis. Swain s output hypothesis 1985, 1998, output may in.
This chapter is about the output hypothesis and beyond. Output oriented language learning with digital media. The acquisitionlearning hypothesis the monitor hypothesis the natural order hypothesis the input hypothesis the affective filter hypothesisthe design and procedures in the natural approachare based on these five hypothesis. Publishers pdf, also known as version of record publication date. The effects of inputbased and outputbased instruction on l2. Krashen 1982 asserts that exposure to comprehensible input i.
Pdf learner output, hypothesis testing, and internalizing linguistic. One theory of language acquisition is the comprehensible output hypothesis. Michael moore sw school of botanical medicine home page. For instance, longs 1996 interaction hypothesis asserts that conversational interaction facilitates l2 acquisition pp. This goal adheres to swains output hypothesis 1995, which looks at output as having three functions. Fostering incidental vocabulary uptake from audiovisual.
Chapter 7 the effect of interaction in acquiring the. In an argument based on merrill swains output hypothesis 97, ortega explains that learners must have opportunities for pushed output in the second languageessentially, comprehensible input is not enough for optimal language growth 62. Students are asked to prepare their own talk using only brief notes. Apr 25, 2012 output hypothesis output, 1980 indicates the outcome of what the student has learned. The students of applied linguisticslane 423 section ga and da, class of spring 2012. In chapter 2, goh and burns base their discussion of the cognitive processes in. This is the original version of principles and practice, as published in 1982, with only minor changes. Swain explains that, output pushes learners to process language more deeply with more mental effort. Modified or pushed output refers to corrections or rephrasings that are elicited by the l2 learners interlocutor.
The input hypothesis is only concerned with acquisition, not learning. Models of integrating content and language learning. The term push is borrowed from a comment that merrill swain made as long ago as 1985, in proposing what became known in contradistinction to krashens input hypothesis as the output hypothesis. On the same note schmidt 1990, attempting at explicating the noticing hypothesis from swain s standpoint, further posits that conscious awareness or noticing of grammar plays an important role in language learning. Cooperative small group discussion jalt publications. Stephen krashens 5 hypotheses of second language acquisition. As its name suggests, the output hypothesis was initially formulated as a reaction to krashens 1985. Swains comprehensible output hypothesis 1985 maintains that the development of a learner s. A representative of social constructivist model is long s 1983 interaction hypothesis. That is, language produced by the learners that can be understood by other speakers of the language. Stephen krashens theory of second language acquisition. The comprehensible output hypothesis short essay questions advantages of collaborative dialogues. Swains comprehensible output hypoth esis 1985 maintains that the development of a leamer s communicative competence does not merely depend on comprehensible input. These observations led swain to formulate the output hypothesis, which.
Swain put it as the need for a learner to be pushed toward the delivery of a message that is not only conveyed, but that is conveyed precisely. Swains comprehensible output hypoth esis 1985 maintains that the development of a leamers communicative competence does not merely depend on comprehensible input. According to merrill swain, the output hypothesis claims that the act of producing language speaking or writing constitutes under certain circumstances, part of the process of second language learning 1. The act of producing language speaking and writing constitutes part of the process of second language learning. Task implementation in the clil classroom ma r i a ba s t e r r e c h e a ma r i a d e l pi l a r ga r c i a ma y o. Po r t a li n g u a r u m 22, junio 2014 722 pushed output and noticing in a dictogloss. This hypothesis posits that output may promote learners to progress from the semantic, openended. Krashen s secondlanguage acquisition theory and the teaching of edited american english recent research in composition theory has provided writing teachers with an abundance of information and techniques for teaching most parts of the writing process. She claims that practicing the language helps learners observe their own production, which is. In an argument based on merrill swain s output hypothesis 97, ortega explains that learners must have opportunities for pushed output in the second languageessentially, comprehensible input is not enough for optimal language growth 62.
She goes on to describe that the language use is mediating the learning of the l2. Swain s 1985 output hypothesis has been influential in clarifying the role of speaking and writing in second language learning. Pdf revisiting input and output hypotheses in second. Theory, practice and pedagogy, 11 june 2015, the university of hong kong. In the field of second language acquisition, there are many theories about the most effective way for language learners to acquire new language forms. A read is counted each time someone views a publication summary such as the title, abstract, and list of authors, clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the fulltext. A representative of social constructivist model is longs 1983 interaction hypothesis.
Swain s output hypothesis proposes more balanced instruction integrating. Fostering incidental vocabulary uptake from audiovisual materials. International journal of language learning and applied. The role of input and output tasks in grammar instruction. Pergamon system 26 1998 175182 system comprehensible output. Pdf revisiting input and output hypotheses in second language. Specifically, pushed outputs role in helping learners to acquire a receptive knowledge of new lexical items was compared with more traditional approaches to teaching new. By noticing this gap, learners becomes aware of it and may be able to modify. Pdf the effect of swains push out hypothesis on promoting. Students listen to the following audio files to prepare their interview and get ideas about. Through collaborative dialogue learners engage in coconstructing their.
Although the theories and research of stephen krashen are by no means universally accepted, since the early 1980s, he has arguably influenced the debate on the role of input in sla more than any other researcher. Swain 1985, 2000 proposed that successful language acquisition requires not only comprehensible input, but also comprehensible output. In other words, producing output is a significant way for a learner to test hypotheses about the target language. Swain theory explains the process of learning a new language and teaches who can influence the learner to learn. It is worth noting, however, that some of the students used the past tense in their final production. Stephen krashens 5 hypotheses of second language acquisition audio version. Its history and its future merrill swain ontario institute for studies in education of the university of toronto language learning distinguished scholar in residence of the national research center for foreign language education of beijing foreign studies university. Sophic however is caught up with whether this new word. Abstract the comprehensible output co hypothesis states that we acquire language when we attempt to transmit a message but fail and have to try again. For a concise overview of krashen s theory see higashi 1988 in english teaching forum.
The originator of the comprehensible output hypothesis, merrill swain swain, 1985, does not claim that co is responsible for all or even most of our language competence. Swain 1995 explains that, output pushes learners to process language more deeply with more mental effort than does input, 2000, p. Developed by merrill swain, the comprehensible output co hypothesis states that learning takes place when learners encounter a gap in their linguistic knowledge of the second language l2. Dec 10, 2016 output hypothesis theory by merrill swain yukhei wong. Krashens input hypothesis and swains output hypothesis have many differences. Krashens secondlanguage acquisition theory and the teaching of edited american english recent research in composition theory has provided writing teachers with an abundance of information and techniques for teaching most parts of the writing process. Now let s move on the definition of output hypothesis. Krashens 1985 monitor model is such a theory, which. It also aims to illustrate how this can be achieved by means of focused communication tasks and to consider the place of such tasks in language pedagogy. According to this hypothesis, the learner improves and progresses when heshe receives second language input that is one step beyond hisher current stage of linguistic. Krashens theories of second languageacquisition consist of five main hypotheses. Swains 1985 output hypothesis has been influential in clarifying the role of speaking and writing in second language learning. The comprehensible output hypothesis and selfdirected.
On the basis of swain s output hypothesis, we assumed that encouraging adult learners university students to produce targetlike output would promote their achievement of the grammatical. The second assumption based on swain s output hypothesis and adult learning psychology is that productive activities as. What i need in this paper is just detailed summary and critical comments on it not just summarising of the pushed output hypothesis in second language learning established first by swain 1985. Current thinking in sla methodology favours knowledge construction rather than simple instructivist learning as an appropriate paradigm for language learning. Krashen s 1985 monitor model is such a theory, which.
782 807 390 637 608 656 875 323 711 613 1240 224 714 1210 109 769 951 432 696 176 1223 818 1091 740 1235 114 522 682 247 401 612 1350 1332 1028 886 121 1213 1320 542 703 866 422 1273 1397 1017 220 374 1131 1375 669